![]() |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
Breaking News Forest Service Fee Watch BLM Fee Watch Laws & Court Cases Publications Resolutions Cartoons & Photos |
Search Our Site: |
||||||||
| | ![]() | |
The girls were gone longer than the previous day. Cheryl then returned with a smile. “We got the permit!” I kept my enthusiasm in check, but I was glad for Cheryl and Ellen, since seeing The Wave was the main goal of the trip for them. Ellen informed me our ball, lucky number one, was the first to tumble out of the ball cage. We would be seeing The Wave tomorrow! Our $7.00 per person fee was paid. This is the actual fee. The $5.00 fee applicants pay for an online application is a processing fee (read: racket). When they arrive to pick up their permit, they must pay another $7.00 per person for the permit.
One gentleman did not get a permit, and he announced he would be going to The Wave anyway. The BLM employee said something to the effect of, “you’re showing disrespect to all these good folks who are trying hard to follow the rules.” This remark mattered not a whit to the guy, and I could understand the man’s feelings on the matter. The whole thing is just wrong.
With that, we were off to Zion again to try hiking to Observation Point. We were thwarted quickly by an iced-over trail. One hiker slipped on the rock-hard glaze and actually fell to another switchback below. He was lucky he didn’t fall further, as much of the trail traverses extremely exposed cliffs. We opted for the Emerald Pools trail, which turned out to be an excellent choice. We made it to all of the pools, got some great photos and had a nice late lunch at a pizza place in Springdale.
VISITING THE WAVE
Not having to report to the Kanab BLM office in the hopes of receiving a permit for The Wave meant we could finally get an early start, and maybe get some nice early morning pictures. The road was sufficiently dried out and we made the drive without incident. Several cars at the large parking area indicated there were folks more ambitious than us already on their way to The Wave. The BLM supplies a detailed route description and a nice map to guide you to the reportedly obscure destination. Indeed, without prior information, The Wave would be a challenge to locate efficiently, as the actual attraction is very small.
The BLM route description was well written and the detailed map was spot-on. We hiked the distance to The Wave, 2.5 miles, in under an hour. The scenery along the way was impressive, to say the least.
Upon arrival at The Wave, you sense you are entering a blessed place set aside by the powers that created it. With all the hoopla on the internet, the fee scam and stories of desperate folks trying to see The Wave any way they can, one can’t help but be drawn up in the mysticism surrounding it. Once one has finally arrived and enters “the gates,” thus ending what for many has been a frustrating quest, the overwhelming sense of awe cannot be ignored.

The Wave is a photographer’s paradise, and will be a pleasure to photograph with any camera in any sort of light. Bad pictures of The Wave are rare, and even if they are bad, taken by the worst photographer alive, The Wave won’t fail to impress. It defies description, and even in a bad photo, viewers will gaze with wonder at nature’s inspired and miraculous handiwork.
![]() | | ![]() | ![]() |
We immediately hung a right and walked through a narrow slot illuminated by reflected light. The place was positively magical, uplifting, maybe even euphoric for my two ecstatic hiking partners. We dropped our packs off and immediately went scampering through the sandstone wonderland with cameras chattering. All told, we shot hundreds of photos.




We made it a point to visit Wave 2, another wonder not far to the west. We have an old, faded poster of formations in Wave 2 in our home, and Ellen longed to replace it with our own photo. We paused for some lunch at Wave 2, seeing no one else. We then explored the wonderful sandstone escarpment above The Waves, snapping more photos before returning to The Wave proper for another break and more photos.
Wire Pass is a fun little slot, quite narrow in spots and literally cool. On hot days it’s certainly a great spot to retreat to. Wire Pass empties rather undramatically into Buckskin Gulch, where hikers can choose to hike either up or down stream. All told, this was going to be an 11 mile day, so I chose to relax at the confluence while Ellen and Cheryl ventured down stream for a bit. Upon their return, we scampered back out of Wire Pass and headed for the car.
Lots of folks don’t mind fees, they feel they’re necessary and even good. In some cases, this is true, such as State or National Parks. However, these attractions are under different management systems and they are held accountable for the management of their funds. Public lands are held hostage under the current and ongoing FLREA program, and this is a bad thing. The program is fraught with plenty of opportunity for inappropriate mismanagement of the moneys collected, with no accountability to the public at all. The agencies are going great guns on the privatization of our public lands, all in the name of profit, with no accountability, with no input from the public, charging folks to access land they should be able to access for free, because they are tax paying Americans. This is a very ugly thing.
So I began to wonder, under what circumstances did The Wave get mixed up in the fee system to begin with?
Kitty Benzar, President of the Western Slope No-Fee Coalition:
It was made a fee area under Fee Demo in May 1997, when there were no restrictions. The game was wide open for fees anywhere and everywhere, no public notice or comment required, none sought. When FLREA with all its pesky restrictions and prohibitions happened, that put the BLM in a quandary. Follow the law? Or look for a way around it? Of course you know what they did. Since it's backcountry (and in this case Wilderness), they couldn't throw down a toilet here and a picnic table there to try and qualify for a Standard Amenity Fee. So, as in many other places, they jumped on the Special Recreation Permit section of FLREA. You may remember it reads (in its entirety):
(h) Special Recreation Permit Fee- The Secretary may issue a special recreation permit, and charge a special recreation permit fee in connection with the issuance of the permit, for specialized recreation uses of Federal recreational lands and waters, such as group activities, recreation events, motorized recreational vehicle use.
The weasel words are "such as" which have been interpreted to mean anything BLM wants them to, including entry to Wilderness. Would a reasonable person think that a few individuals hiking in backcountry constitutes "specialized recreation use"? I don't think so, but the clause is arguably ambiguous, and we've seen how the courts bend over backwards to defer to agency interpretation even of parts that are NOT ambiguous at all, so it's never been tested. Also there's never been a great test case on the criminal side. If I ever hear of one, we will try and pursue it.
Kitty Benzar: The rules for SRPs are quite murky. That's why the BLM likes them.
The Wave is in The Vermillion Cliffs Wilderness area. People accessing a wilderness area and not using the amenities shouldn’t be charged a fee. To get around that, the convenient “Special Recreation Permit Fee” was invented. Getting around it is one thing, but it doesn’t make it right. The area contains no developed facilities, and as a designated wilderness never will, yet the BLM continues to collect money under the FLREA. The online application system is a racket, a lucrative money making scheme. Where is all that money going?
Kitty Benzar: Me, I'm with the locals. Just go and take my chances. I haven't heard of any heavy-handed enforcement. I think the BLM staff is too busy back at the office counting the money to get out and patrol the land.
Concerns about potentially crowded conditions at The Wave are justified. The Wave is very small, and as attractions go on a spectacular level, The Wave itself can’t compare to the majesty of other desert areas in Utah and Arizona. Its tinyness works against it, and all impact would be directly on The Wave and the immediate surroundings.
Kitty Benzar: I have NOTHING against a system of limited permits! In Grand Canyon, where I have hiked hundreds of miles from an early age and guided professionally, they went to a limited-permit and "zoning" system in the late '70s to protect both the area and the experience. You had to apply well in advance, and when the permits for the trip you wanted to do were gone they were gone. There was excellent compliance because the system assured that you would have to share your designated area with only a limited and appropriate number of other people so everyone would have a good experience. It was a win/win for both the Canyon and the hikers. The permits were FREE. Then under Fee Demo Grand Canyon started charging money for backcountry permits. Totally different situation. Now it is a commercial transaction. The agency has an incentive to allow as many people as possible to get permits - perhaps more than is good for the resource - because they get to keep the money. They also have an incentive to issue permits for itineraries that are not safe because they get to keep the money. People are paying money and they expect access in return - they paid for it after all. Some people I'm sure are camping in the inner Canyon without a permit, taking their chances, to save money. That means some "zones" are hosting more campers than they can support, and the experience of permitted campers is negatively impacted by crowding. The whole system has broken down. It's just not that expensive to administer a fair and equitable permit system, and the FS/BLM receive adequate appropriated funding to do that administration. People should all have to abide by whatever the permit rules are, but money should not determine who gets a permit and who doesn't. It's just plain un-American to sell access to public lands to the highest bidder. I am reminded of the Bible story of the moneychangers in the temple. Shame on the BLM for what they put you through and what it cost you!
For some, a limited permit system is inadequate in protecting a treasure like The Wave, and dealing with a necessary evil such as the FLREA system is a price to be paid for that protection, regardless of the accountability.
Kitty Benzar: I disagree that a permit fee is a “necessary evil.” The evil part is right, but it should never be necessary. By using money as a management tool to reduce use, there is constant upward pressure until only the rich few can visit.
People have grown tired of the government and its many agencies not being held accountable and spiraling out of fiscal control. If a fee system is determined to be the answer, how about making the entire Coyote Buttes area a National Monument or Park, which would place the Wave under a system with some degree of accountability and give it and the surrounding Vermillion Cliffs region (equally impressive and complimentary to The Wave) the protection it deserves?
Kitty Benzar: God forbid. Make it a National Park or Monument and the bus tours and snack bars and paved roads won’t be far behind. In fact, I think it was better protected before it was declared a Wilderness Area. Sometimes these special designations are just a way of painting targets on the land because they attract more visitors.
Cheryl Bradley: It may be a slippery slope to charge fees to access public land, but in my mind the most important issue concerning The Wave is preservation and protection of the area. The issue of whether fees are proper or improper seems almost inconsequential. Some fragile lands may need a gatekeeper and that's going to cost extra money. While I think the BLM should account for how the permit/lottery revenue is being spent, it does seem that they are trying to control the impact of a constant stream of visitors on a remote wilderness area. I would never propose to spotlight The Wave or the surrounding area by making it part of the Parks System. I think the battle should be focused on blatantly inappropriate fees, such as the Forest Service charging fees to drive on a Colorado State Highway (Mt. Evans).
Until The Wave and all other public lands are free from the racket of the FLREA, which is nothing more than a commercial take-over and privatization of our public lands, this double taxing of American citizens will continue. If The Wave deserves extra protection, it needs to be done properly, with accountability, and with the blessing of the people, under a proper system. Until then, it’s just a cash cow for the BLM.
It is said the best things in life are free. Everyone knows this is not always the case, and in the case of the FLREA, this is certainly the not truth. Under proper management, The Wave would indeed be qualified for this statement. Under the corporate greed-driven FLREA, despite its awesome beauty and wonder, The Wave is neither.
LINKS
Mount Evans & Spanish Peak videos links are on the SummitPost page at the bottom of the article.